As with most things in life, setting health and safety performance targets can help improve performance by giving people something tangible to aim for and because they show that the organisation is serious about the issue. However, setting targets can be fraught with problems. the obvious outcome we want from health and safety is that no one is harmed at work, but given that hazards always exist, risk management can only reduce the likelihood rather than eliminate it all together. But, setting what may be considered a more realistic target (i.e. something above zero) can give the impression that accidents are acceptable or that the organisation is willing to compromise on safety.
It is possible to set reactive targets (e.g. accident, incident and ill health rates; claims, enforcement and complaints) but their use may be limited. It is probably much better to set targets for positive outcomes. Examples may be:
* Completing inspections and audits as per schedule
* Implementing recommendations within a specified time scale
* People completing training
* People achieving competency standards
* Achieving a recognised standard (OHSAS 18001, RoSPA award)
Thursday, November 23, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment